According to multiple reports, FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s parents face scrutiny over their reported involvement with their son’s business operations. The two Stanford professors Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried have not been charged with any wrongdoing, but the current FTX CEO, John J. Ray III, recently told members of the U.S. Congress that Joseph Bankman and “the family certainly received payments” from FTX.
SBF’s Ethics-Obsessed Parents Face Scrutiny Over Their Alleged Ties With FTX Operations
On Saturday, a report from Reuters detailed that the FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) will likely surrender to a U.S. extradition request, after it was initially reported that SBF would fight extradition to the United States. Reports detail that SBF’s parents, who are reportedly in The Bahamas supporting their son, face scrutiny over how involved they were with FTX operations.
SBF’s parents Barbara Fried (pictured left) and Joseph Bankman (pictured right) are two law school professors at Stanford University.
While speaking in front of the U.S. Congress about the FTX collapse, the current FTX CEO, John J. Ray III, was asked about SBF’s parents and whether or not Joseph Bankman was an employee. “He received payments,” the new CEO and FTX restructuring chief said. “The family certainly received payments.”
The new FTX CEO John J. Ray III (pictured left) testified in front of Congress and noted that SBF’s family “certainly received payments” from FTX.
The FTX CEO’s statements in front of Congress follow the report that alleged $121 million in Bahamian real estate was associated with SBF’s parents and FTX. One particular home was a $16.4 million house purchased in SBF’s parents’ name, but SBF detailed “it was intended to be the company’s property. I don’t know how that was papered in.” SBF’s parents’ spokesperson said:
[The couple] never intended to and never believed they had any beneficial or economic ownership of the house.
Fried and Bankman both teach law classes at Stanford University, and the news publication Puck recently published an article that says SBF’s parents were obsessed with ethics. SBF, himself, told the New York Times (NYT) that his parents “bore no responsibility” for his affairs. Bankman had scheduled law classes to teach this month and he recently canceled his classes, while Fried recently resigned from super political action committee (PAC) Mind The Gap, a PAC she helped co-found in 2018.
According to the Wall Street Journal authors Justin Baer and Hardika Singh, a spokesperson for the family explained that Bankman was paid by FTX for at least a year as he was working on charitable projects for the now-defunct crypto exchange. It has also been said that Bankman advised SBF before he spoke in front of the House Financial Services Committee on Dec. 8, 2021.
Reports also note that Bankman advised SBF on legal matters prior to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing and his resignation. While it is currently unknown if SBF’s parents had been more involved with SBF’s business affairs, the family faces significant legal bills from the white-collar lawyer SBF hired.
Tags in this story
Bahamaian real estate, Bahamas Real Estate, Barbara Fried, Certainly Paid, Chapter 11 Bankruptcy, Ethics, Former FTX CEO, ftx, FTX CEO, FTX co-founder, FTX collapse, FTX fallout, FTX Family, John J. Ray III, Joseph Bankman, Law Professors, Mind The Gap, now-defunct crypto exchange, Paid Employee, Sam Bankman-Fried, sbf, Stanford University, Super PAC
What do you think about the reports that say SBF’s parents face scrutiny over their alleged involvement with their son’s firm? Let us know what you think about this subject in the comments section below.
Jamie Redman
Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons, Editorial photo credit: Nathan Howard/ Getty Images
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods or services mentioned in this article.
